Author: brotherkarl

  • Was Favorinus the Orator really a congenital eunuch, or is it fiction?

    Was Favorinus the Orator really a congenital eunuch, or is it fiction?

    While researching eunuchs for my first novel about a 6th-century B.C. Ethiopian eunuch, I ran across a man named Favorinus, a 2nd-century orator famed in Athens and Rome. Wikipedia calls him a man of “great oratorical powers,” but Polemon of Laodicea, a famous physiognomist during that time and a bitter rival, seems to have erased that legacy by claiming that Favorinus was “born without testicles.” When he said it, people believed him and took it literally.


    About 70 years after Favorinus’s death, another orator,
    Philostratus, echoed Polemon sentiments, calling Favorinus
    a “hermaphrodite.” Since that time, Favorinus has been
    called a congenital eunuch and today is known as one of the
    most famous intersex people to ever have lived on earth.
    I don’t know though. Is it true that he really was a congenital
    eunuch, or is that all just fiction fueled by rivalry? Did
    Favorinus himself confirm this? Anyone close in his family?
    Is there anything else from his time? Are there physician
    records or contemporary documents to back it up?
    Why does the only claim from his time come from an enemy,
    and later accounts, like Philostratus’s, are from those who
    never met him? Was it true or has a mean comment
    elaborated on and written in history, overshadowed this
    man’s entire legacy as a brilliant orator. As anybody else
    ever talked this? Does anybody have anything that
    substantiates Polemon’s claim. If anything documented from
    his own time to verify this.

    I really would like to hear from some folks on this.

    *This blog and comments on this post are from a different source, if you would like to see the original sources, see below: